Wealth Management
The Library · On Planning · Business Owners

Financial Planning for Business Owners

The owner's balance sheet

The business owner’s balance sheet. For most business owners, the business is the largest asset they own, the toughest to value, and the least liquid. Entity structure, how the owner is paid, what the business keeps, the retirement plan, the real estate, and the terms of an eventual sale are all planning tools, and used together they can be powerful.


A financial plan built for someone with a W-2 paycheck does not fit a business owner. The income is variable and partly your choice. Your largest asset has no listed price and cannot be sold in a day the way a public stock can. And the decisions that shape all of it — how the business is structured, what it pays you, what it keeps, what it owns — are yours to make.

The business as an asset

Three features separate a private business from everything else a family owns, and each one changes the planning.

  • Concentration. For many owners the business is the largest share of their net worth, exposed to one industry, one region, often a handful of customers.
  • Illiquidity. A sale can take six to twelve months in a good market, and longer in a weak one.
  • Valuation uncertainty. A private business’ valuation can be a range, and the range moves with earnings, comparable transactions, the buyer pool, and general market and credit conditions.
Fig. 1 — The owner’s balance sheet

One asset, usually the largest and the least liquid

The same net worth, arranged two ways. What separates them is not the total; it is how much of it could be turned into cash this year without selling the thing that produces the income.

An owner's net worth compared with an employee's Two stacked bars of equal height. The employee's is made mostly of retirement accounts and taxable investments, with a home. The owner's is dominated by one block for the business, with smaller blocks for a home, retirement accounts, and cash. A bracket marks how little of the owner's total is liquid. An employeeAn owner retirement accounts taxable investments home equity the business retirement accounts home equity not sellable this year same net worth, different problem
Illustrative only; the proportions are invented and no allocation or outcome is implied. Every owner’s mix differs, and a business interest’s value depends on a valuation that has not been performed.

Reserves, and where the owner is headed

Reserve needs typically run larger for a business owner than for a W-2 employee at the same net worth, and they exist in two places at once: the household and the business itself.

It is worth saying that a concentrated position in a business you understand is not automatically a problem to be solved. Some of the best investors we have met and studied are business owners whose portfolio is largely the assets inside a company they know well, delivering good returns for a long time. What matters is what the business earns on the capital in it and whether that can continue, the same question worth asking of any holding.

Past that, the right structure depends on where the business owner is headed, and the two common directions pull opposite ways. An owner planning to exit within a decade is usually building transferable value and moving cash toward the household. That favors clean books, earnings that do not depend on the owner, and wealth accumulating outside the business. An owner planning to hold for decades, or to pass the business to the next generation, may prefer to keep capital working inside it and plan around the cost of taking it out later. Those two paths point toward different entity structures, different compensation, different retirement plans, and different investments outside the business.

Entity structure and compensation

Entity selection and how the owner is paid are among the questions we get asked most. They interact with payroll taxes, the qualified business income deduction, retirement plan capacity, and basis.

For an S corporation owner, the split between W-2 wages and distributions is the central lever. Wages carry payroll tax; distributions generally do not. That pushes toward a lower salary. Pushing back is the requirement that an owner-employee take reasonable compensation for the work they actually do. In practice that means a salary supported by what someone else would be paid for the same role, in the same industry, at the same size of business. That support should be assembled from comparable-role data and filed.

Three more considerations:

  • Retirement plan capacity. Contributions to a company plan are calculated from W-2 wages, not from profit or distributions. For an S corporation, the employer contribution is generally limited to 25% of wages, so an owner who takes $80,000 of salary and $220,000 of distributions has built a $300,000 year with only $80,000 of it to use as the base of the retirement plan contribution calculation. The salary chosen to reduce payroll tax also sets the ceiling on what can be sheltered.
  • The qualified business income deduction (Section 199A). A deduction of up to 20% of qualified business income. Three cases: below the income thresholds, most owners get it regardless of wages. Above the thresholds, a specified service business, which includes most professional practices, loses it entirely. Above the thresholds and not a service business, the deduction is capped at roughly half the W-2 wages the business pays, so paying too little in wages can shrink it. Raising salary helps only in that third case.
  • Basis. Basis is your investment in the company for tax purposes. It rises with what you contribute and with profits the company earns, and falls with losses and distributions taken out. It matters in two ways. A loss is generally deductible only to the extent of basis, so an owner can have a real economic loss and no deduction for it in that year. And distributions taken beyond basis can become taxable rather than tax-free returns of capital. Basis is tracked by the CPA, and the decisions that move it are made during the year, not at filing.

Current thresholds are in The Tax Numbers.

The salary that minimizes payroll tax also caps the retirement plan

The instinct is to set as low a salary as is defensible, but there are tradeoffs to that. For an S corporation with no employees, the employee deferral is a fixed dollar limit, or 100% of compensation if that is lower, while the employer contribution is limited to 25% of W-2 wages. So the salary decision and the retirement plan decision are the same decision.

Take an owner under 50 with $300,000 of business profit and no employees, using 2026 figures.

Fig. 2 — The same $300,000, split three ways
W-2 salaryPass-through profitInto the planTotal taxTake-home dollarsContributed over 15 yearsOver 20 years
$120,000$140,800$54,500$52,700$192,800$817,500$1,090,000
$150,000$101,000$62,000$55,100$182,900$930,000$1,240,000
$190,000$48,300$72,000$57,800$170,200$1,080,000$1,440,000
Hypothetical. A business owner under 50, married filing jointly, with $300,000 of cash flow available for compensation and no employees, using 2026 figures: $24,500 employee deferral, employer contribution of 25% of wages, $72,000 annual additions cap, $32,200 standard deduction (IRS Notice 2025-67 and Rev. Proc. 2025-32). Total tax is federal income tax plus both sides of Social Security and Medicare. It assumes no other household income, no Section 199A deduction, and no state tax; California tax would change every row. The last two columns are contributions only, the same amount deposited each year with no investment return assumed and no change in limits, income, or law. Whatever those balances earn or lose is not shown. Illustration only, not a projection or a recommendation.

Raising the salary from $120,000 to $190,000 moves $17,500 into the retirement plan and costs about $5,100 in additional tax, and take-home dollars fall by roughly $22,600 because that money went into the plan instead of the checking account. It is still the owner’s money; it is just no longer spendable this year. Over twenty years the difference in what gets contributed is $350,000, before anything those contributions earn. Early in a career, cash for a house or a growing family can matter more than the deferral. Later, with the house bought and the practice established, the deferral usually wins. The useful version of this conversation compares take-home pay, total tax, long-term wealth, and when retirement becomes possible, run on real numbers rather than a rule of thumb.

We model this: what the current structure costs, what a different split does to payroll tax, plan contributions, the 199A deduction, and household cash flow. We bring the numbers and a recommendation. Then it goes to your CPA, who knows your filings and may see it differently.

Separately, real estate used by the business is often better held in a separate entity and leased to the operating company. That separates the appreciating asset from the operating risk, creates a rent stream that continues after a sale, and gives the owner something to keep when the business is sold. It also adds a related-party arrangement that has to be documented at arm’s length.

Retirement plan selection

A business owner chooses the plan rather than being handed one, and the range runs from a few thousand dollars a year to well into six figures.

Fig. 3 — The plans, and who they fit
PlanWho funds itFits
SEP-IRAEmployer only, up to 25% of wagesSimplicity, few or no employees, modest target
Solo 401(k)Employee deferral plus employer contributionNo employees but a spouse; more savings at the same salary than a SEP
Safe harbor 401(k)Employee deferral plus a required employer contribution for staffOnce there are employees and the owner wants to defer fully
Profit sharing, new comparabilityEmployer, allocated by groupAdded to a 401(k) to direct more of the company contribution to owners and older employees
Cash balance pensionEmployer, set each year by an actuarySteady profits, an owner over about 45 who wants to save well past 401(k) limits
General characteristics only, not a recommendation. Eligibility, contribution amounts, and testing depend on the employee census, compensation, ages, and plan design, and are determined with a plan consultant or third-party administrator. Current limits are in The Tax Numbers.

Three things about the menu are worth knowing. The solo 401(k) beats a SEP at the same salary, because the deferral is a dollar amount rather than a percentage: on a $100,000 salary in 2026, a SEP allows about $25,000 and a solo 401(k) about $49,500. Adding employees changes the question from how much the owner can defer to how much of the company contribution can be directed toward the owner, which is what new comparability allocation does when the ages and the census support it. And a cash balance pension is the option that lets a high-earning business owner put away far more than any 401(k) allows, often well into six figures, because an actuary sets the contribution from age, compensation, and a target benefit rather than from a flat limit. The obligation is funded on a schedule that does not pause in a weak year, so it fits steady profits and not volatile ones.

The plans with the largest owner capacity also carry the largest required contributions for employees, which is a real cost and sometimes a deliberate retention tool. Current limits are in The Tax Numbers. The right answer at five employees is rarely the right answer at twenty-five, so a plan left alone for a decade is worth re-examining.

Risk management for an owner

Some of what threatens a business owner’s wealth is not market risk and cannot be diversified away. It gets transferred, insured, or documented.

  • Key-person dependence. A business that cannot operate without the owner is a risk to the family while it is held, and often a discount to the price at sale. Reducing it takes years and raises the eventual price.
  • Buy-sell agreement. Sets what happens to an ownership interest on death, disability, retirement, or a partner leaving. Two structures: in a cross-purchase the surviving owners buy the interest and generally get a basis increase in what they buy; in an entity redemption the company buys it, which is simpler and generally gives the survivors no basis increase. Valuation method and trigger definitions belong in the document.
  • Funding for that agreement. Commonly life and disability insurance. An agreement without a funding source describes an obligation nobody can meet. The firm is affiliated with an insurance agency, disclosed below.
  • Disability coverage. Sized to what the owner actually earns, which is not always the salary set for tax reasons.
  • Liability. General coverage plus an umbrella, and for a business with staff, employment practices exposure that a general policy may not cover.

Planning before a transaction

Some business owners sell. Some never do, and transfer the business to family, to employees, or wind it down instead. Both paths have planning considerations and can be optimized.

  • Planning to sell. Build value that transfers to a buyer: earnings that do not depend on the owner, a management layer, less customer concentration, financial records a buyer can verify, and contracts and leases that survive a change of control. Then the pre-transaction items below.
  • Planning to hold. Build continuity rather than a business that is ready to sell: who runs it next and whether they want to, how a transfer to family or employees gets funded, how ownership and control get separated between heirs who work in the business and heirs who do not, and how the value gets taxed at death when there is no sale to pay the bill.

The rest of this section applies when a sale is a real possibility, even a distant one.

Several of the highest-value moves must be completed before a binding agreement to sell exists. Gifts of business interests to family or trusts, and charitable transfers of interests, generally have to happen before the sale is locked in. Transfer afterward and the IRS may treat the seller as having made the sale anyway, under the assignment-of-income doctrine, which can collapse the benefit. Valuation discounts for lack of marketability and control can also become hard to support once a price has been negotiated.

Fig. 4 — The window

Several of the best moves close before the deal is signed

Most sale planning happens in the year of the sale. The transfers that matter most have to happen before that.

Timeline of planning moves before and after a business sale A timeline. A wide early band is labeled as the years when gifts and charitable transfers of business interests can still be made. A vertical marker is the binding agreement. After it, a narrower band covers deal structure and tax work, and a later band covers the years after the sale. BINDING AGREEMENT gifts and charitable transfers of business interests valuation and clean-up work deal structure,tax on the sale what to do withthe proceeds years before years after
General timing only, not legal or tax advice. Whether a particular transfer is respected depends on facts, timing, and structure, and is determined by your attorney and CPA rather than by a diagram.

Structure can drive the tax more than the headline price does.

  • Asset sale. Usually the buyer’s preference. The price is allocated across asset classes, and the portions allocated to equipment and depreciated real property can trigger depreciation recapture taxed at ordinary rates or at 25%, generally in the year of sale even when proceeds arrive over time.
  • Stock sale. Usually the seller’s preference. Generally capital gain, but the buyer receives no step-up, and the price typically accounts for that.
  • Installment sale. Spreads gain recognition across years and makes the seller a lender to the buyer, subject to the buyer’s continued performance.

Two provisions require advance positioning:

  • Section 1202, qualified small business stock. Stock in a qualifying C corporation may receive favorable treatment, subject to holding-period and company-size requirements. The rules were modified by 2025 legislation, so current terms should be confirmed rather than assumed.
  • Section 6166. Where an estate is large and illiquid, estate tax attributable to a closely held business may be payable in installments, which is one reason the estate structure and the business structure get reviewed together. Estate Planning When the Estate Is Large covers the transfer-tax side.

After a sale the tax pattern inverts. Sale-year income is a one-year peak, and the years that follow, before Social Security and required minimum distributions begin, are often the lowest-bracket window a family will have. Planning for Taxes covers that sequence. The proceeds then become a portfolio problem with an unusual feature: wealth that was concentrated, illiquid, and under the owner’s control becomes liquid, diversified, and priced by a market every day.

One question has nothing to do with tax. What does an ordinary Tuesday look like two years after the sale? An owner who cannot answer may still be ready to sell. Being ready to be done is a separate question.

Where this lands

For business owners, one asset sits at the center. Planning around it is important and includes entity selection, what and how the business pays you, retirement plans, agreements, and exit planning or the decision not to exit. Each of those has more depth behind it than one article can hold.

What to carry away
  • A closely held business concentrates wealth, and that is not automatically a problem. What matters is what it earns on the capital in it and whether that can continue.
  • How you optimize can differ on whether you intend to exit the business or not.
  • The salary you take affects several things at once, including how much you can defer from tax and build long term inside a retirement plan.
  • IRAs, Roth IRAs, SIMPLE and SEP IRAs, solo 401(k)s, 401(k)s with and without safe harbor and profit sharing, and pension plans are all tools in the tax and wealth-building toolbelt. Which ones are available depends on the business.
  • Manage the risks a portfolio cannot: the business depending on you, what happens to an ownership interest if an owner dies or leaves, disability, and liability.
  • How a sale is structured can change the tax as much as the price does, and the structure that suits a buyer is often not the one that suits a seller.
  • Giving business interests to family or charity before a sale, rather than giving cash afterward, can move future appreciation out of your estate and avoid capital gains tax on what is donated. It generally has to be done before a binding agreement to sell exists.
  • The low-bracket years after a sale are often the best Roth conversion window a family gets.

Planning around the business an owner has built.

Planning for business owners, alongside the CPA and the attorney who structure and draft, is central to this practice.

How we work →

Educational content only. This article is for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute personalized investment, tax, or legal advice, and does not create an advisory relationship. It does not recommend any entity structure, compensation arrangement, retirement plan, insurance product, or transaction structure. Tax provisions referenced, including Sections 199A, 1202, 6166, and the installment sale and depreciation recapture rules, are summarized generally; their application depends on facts, timing, structure, and current law, and several were modified by 2025 legislation. Confirm current terms with your CPA and attorney, who determine tax treatment, prepare filings, and draft documents. The firm does not perform business valuations, prepare tax returns, draft legal documents, or provide investment banking services.

Insurance is referenced as it commonly appears in owner planning, including buy-sell funding, key-person coverage, and disability coverage. The firm is affiliated through common ownership with TenBroeck Insurance Services, a licensed insurance agency, and receives compensation when insurance products are purchased through the affiliate — a conflict of interest described in the firm’s Form ADV Part 2A, available upon request. Clients are under no obligation to purchase insurance through the affiliate. All investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The firm and its related persons may or may not hold any security, fund, or asset class mentioned, and any such position may change at any time.

TenBroeck Wealth Management, LLC is an investment adviser registered with the State of California (DFPI). Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The firm does not provide tax preparation or legal services; tax and estate strategies are developed in coordination with your CPA and attorney, who confirm and implement tax filings and legal documents. The firm is affiliated through common ownership with TenBroeck Insurance Services, a licensed insurance agency; the firm or its representatives may receive commissions on insurance products implemented for clients — compensation separate from advisory fees that creates a conflict of interest. Clients are under no obligation to purchase insurance through the affiliate. This and other material conflicts are described in the firm's Form ADV Part 2A, available upon request. Insurance products include life insurance and guaranteed-income and annuity products of the kind discussed in this article. TenBroeck Insurance Services and its licensed representatives may receive commissions if a client chooses to implement such products through the affiliate. Clients may purchase insurance through any provider they choose.

Written by Schad TenBroeck, CFP®, Principal. CFP Board owns the marks CFP® and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER® in the United States.