Estate Planning When the Estate Is Large
Most families are well served by a revocable trust, a pour-over will, powers of attorney, a health care directive, and current beneficiary designations. Above a certain size, the estate tax exemption, it really pays to plan ahead and to coordinate a planner and an experienced estate planning attorney.
This is worth thinking about when what you own is approaching the federal exemption, or is likely to get there. A business that keeps growing, real estate, a concentrated stock position, a windfall on the horizon. In 2026 the federal exemption is $15 million per person, or $30 million for a married couple who plan for it, and the tax on everything above that line is 40%. The figures are indexed and change each January; the current ones are always in The Tax Numbers. The tax reaches what an asset is worth at your death, not what you paid for it. So when a transfer happens changes how much of it the tax can reach.
Your estate attorney designs and drafts all of this, and will do it more thoroughly than any article can describe. Our work sits beside theirs: we know the tools and what they cost, we can say where a technique tends to help and where it tends to disappoint, and we manage the assets that end up inside the structures they build.
The gift is the small part; the growth after it is what leaves the estate
An asset moved out early is taxed, if at all, on what it was worth that day. Everything it becomes afterward belongs to whoever owns it next.
Lifetime gifts
Two separate allowances govern gifts, and they are easy to confuse. The annual gift tax exclusion is the amount you can give any one person in a year without filing a gift tax return or using anything up. The lifetime gift and estate tax exemption is the much larger amount you can transfer over your lifetime and at death before federal transfer tax applies. Gifts above the annual exclusion draw down the lifetime exemption; they do not usually create a tax bill.
Giving during life rather than at death moves the asset out of your estate now, so whatever it earns from that point forward grows outside the estate and is generally beyond what the estate tax reaches when you die. Timing is the whole advantage, and the price of it is control. A completed gift is gone. You do not vote it, spend it, or take it back. A family that gives an asset it cannot really spare, because a deadline was approaching, is the one that regrets it.
The California question
Gifting cuts the other way for many families here, and the reason is basis. California has no estate tax of its own, so a family below the federal exemption faces no state or federal estate tax either way. Meanwhile, property properly held as community property by a married couple receives a step-up in basis on both halves at the first death, which resets the built-in gain on those assets. Whether an asset qualifies depends on how it is titled and characterized, which the attorney and the CPA determine.
Give a low-basis asset during life and you remove future appreciation from an estate that may never owe estate tax, and you give up a step-up that would have erased the capital gain for whoever inherits it. Below the exemption that trade is usually a poor one. Well above it, the estate tax on decades of appreciation can outweigh the lost step-up several times over. Where a family sits relative to the exemption decides which of those is true for them.
Estate size decides which tradeoffs are worth making
Below the line, the step-up in basis usually outweighs what a transfer gains. Above it, every year of ownership has a price, and the balance starts to favor the tools.
Trusts for a spouse
A spousal lifetime access trust, or SLAT, is a gift to a trust that benefits your spouse. The assets leave your estate, and if a business fails or life turns, they remain reachable, through your spouse.
The appeal is that a family can move a large sum out of the estate without moving it out of reach, which is what makes a gift of that size affordable. The drawback runs through the same door. Two events close it. Divorce ends your access, because the beneficiary is now someone you are no longer married to. Your spouse’s death generally ends it too, because your access ran through them. There are partial answers, and they belong in the document rather than in hindsight: an attorney can define “spouse” deliberately in the trust itself, and some families pair the trust with life insurance on the beneficiary spouse so that the door closing is not also the money vanishing. A third risk catches business owners: whoever serves as trustee votes the business interests you put in.
A SLAT keeps the money reachable through exactly one person
Three things can close the door: a divorce, a death, and the choice of who holds the keys.
GRATs, sales to a trust, and family loans
Three well-worn techniques look different and rest on the same idea. Each is a wager that an asset will grow faster than a low rate the government publishes monthly, and everything above that rate belongs to the next generation.
The clearest is the GRAT, a grantor retained annuity trust. Walk it with round numbers. You put a million dollars of stock into the trust for two years. The trust pays you back the million plus the published rate, call it a hundred thousand over the term, in two annuity payments. If the stock is worth $1.4 million at the end, roughly the $300,000 above what came back to you can pass to your heirs without using gift tax exemption, assuming the trust was structured and the assets valued so that the initial gift was near zero. If the stock falls instead, the trust returns what it has and you are back where you started, out little more than legal fees. Because a failed GRAT costs little, families with concentrated positions often run two-year GRATs one after another, keeping the ones that work. Its costs: you generally have to outlive the term, or much of the value comes back into your estate, what passes to the children faces estate tax again at their deaths, and the annuity returning to you has to go somewhere.
A GRAT that fails costs little, so you keep running them
Two-year trusts, started one after another. Each one either beats the rate and passes the excess down, or lapses and returns the assets.
The installment sale to a grantor trust moves more at once. You seed a trust with a gift, then sell it a larger asset in exchange for a note at the published rate. Because the trust is treated as you for income tax purposes, the sale is generally not a taxable event under long-standing IRS guidance, though the point has never been fully settled in the courts. What the asset earns above the note’s rate stays in the trust. The costs: the seed gift uses exemption, the note has to be serviced from the trust’s own cash flow, and a disappointing asset still owes the note.
The everyday version is a loan to a family member at that same rate. They borrow, invest, and keep whatever exceeds the interest. It has to be a real loan, documented and repaid on schedule, or the IRS treats it as the gift it resembles.
Every freeze is the same bet: the asset beats a published rate
Three techniques, one hurdle. What the asset earns up to the rate comes back to you; what it earns above the rate belongs to the next generation.
How long a trust can last
How long a trust may last is set by the law of the state it is created under, and states differ widely. California limits the term; several states allow far longer or have removed the limit entirely.
A trust created in one of those states, with generation-skipping transfer tax exemption allocated to it correctly, can pass from one generation to the next without a transfer tax at each step. The costs are the ones that come with anything built to last: administration in another state, and terms your descendants live under without having chosen them. Changing a trust’s governing law afterward is sometimes possible and often difficult, so the state gets chosen before signing.
Charitable lead trusts
For a family that has used its exemption and still expects a taxable estate, charitable structures are one of the remaining routes.
A testamentary charitable lead trust pays a charity a set amount each year for a term, and whatever remains above the published rate passes to the heirs. Sized correctly, the charitable deduction can offset much or all of the estate tax. The cost is that the charity is paid first, for years, and the heirs receive later and less certainly. It fits a family that intended to give anyway, and it depends on an attorney doing the sizing against the rate in force.
None of this is a loophole. Each of these is a provision Congress wrote on purpose.
The gift exemption, the grantor trust rules, the published rates, the charitable deduction: each exists because the law intended families to use it. Using them well is part of the same duty as paying what you owe.
Where this lands
Each of these gives up something to get something, and none of them is free. There are others we have not covered, and an experienced estate attorney will know which of them fit a particular family. Below the exemption, the step-up in basis is usually worth more than any transfer technique, which is worth knowing before anything is signed. Above it, the longer an appreciating asset stays in your name, the more of its future the estate tax can reach.
- Most families are served by a revocable trust, a pour-over will, powers of attorney, a health care directive, and current beneficiary designations. What follows those is a second layer that only comes up above the exemption.
- That layer shares one idea: move future appreciation out of the estate while the asset is still cheap. The techniques here are common ones, not a complete list.
- Gifting gives up control to buy time, and in California a low-basis gift also gives up the community-property step-up. Below the exemption that is usually a poor exchange; well above it, the estate tax on the appreciation can outweigh it.
- A SLAT moves assets out while keeping them reachable through your spouse, and generally only through your spouse.
- GRATs, sales to a grantor trust, and family loans are one bet in three forms: the asset beats a published rate and the excess passes down. Each has its own price.
- A trust’s possible lifespan depends on the state it is created under, and that is decided before signing.
- Charitable structures can offset much or all of an estate tax, for a family that intended to give anyway.
- None of it is a loophole, and none of it is done alone: the estate attorney designs and drafts, the CPA confirms the tax treatment, and we manage what ends up inside.
Planning the estate and managing what is inside it.
Coordinating the two, alongside your estate attorney and CPA, is part of our work for families above the exemption.
How we work →Educational content only, and partial by design. This article describes a narrow part of estate planning, the transfer-tax techniques that become relevant above the federal exemption. It does not cover wills, revocable trusts, powers of attorney, health care directives, beneficiary designations, guardianship, incapacity planning, or asset protection, which matter for families of every size. Dollar figures are the 2026 federal amounts, are indexed annually, and may be changed by legislation; confirm the current figures before acting. It is for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute personalized investment, tax, or legal advice, and does not create an advisory relationship. The federal estate and gift tax exemption, the applicable rates, and the published rates used by the techniques described change with law and with time; no figures are stated here, and current figures should be confirmed at the time of any decision. Strategies described — including lifetime gifts, spousal lifetime access trusts, grantor retained annuity trusts, installment sales to grantor trusts, intra-family loans, dynasty trusts, and charitable lead trusts — are irrevocable or long-lived, carry income, gift, estate, and generation-skipping tax consequences, and have costs, risks, and requirements that depend entirely on individual circumstances. Nothing here is a recommendation to transfer, gift, sell, lend, or place in trust any asset. The worked example uses invented round numbers to illustrate mechanics only.
Life insurance is mentioned as a tool some families use alongside a spousal trust; it is not recommended here. The firm is affiliated through common ownership with TenBroeck Insurance Services, a licensed insurance agency, and receives compensation when insurance products are purchased through the affiliate — a conflict of interest described in the firm’s Form ADV Part 2A. Clients are under no obligation to purchase insurance through the affiliate. All investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The firm and its related persons may or may not hold any security, fund, or asset class mentioned, and any such position may change at any time.
TenBroeck Wealth Management, LLC is an investment adviser registered with the State of California (DFPI). Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The firm does not provide tax preparation or legal services; tax and estate strategies are developed in coordination with your CPA and attorney, who confirm and implement tax filings and legal documents. The firm is affiliated through common ownership with TenBroeck Insurance Services, a licensed insurance agency; the firm or its representatives may receive commissions on insurance products implemented for clients — compensation separate from advisory fees that creates a conflict of interest. Clients are under no obligation to purchase insurance through the affiliate. This and other material conflicts are described in the firm's Form ADV Part 2A, available upon request. Insurance products include life insurance and guaranteed-income and annuity products of the kind discussed in this article. TenBroeck Insurance Services and its licensed representatives may receive commissions if a client chooses to implement such products through the affiliate. Clients may purchase insurance through any provider they choose.
Written by Schad TenBroeck, CFP®, Principal. CFP Board owns the marks CFP® and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER® in the United States.